2012年7月13日星期五

Is the Cartel Moving Silver from Scotia Vaults to the SLV to Meet Delivery Requests?




For the 3rd consecutive day (following the 1 million ounce withdrawal Monday and 651k ounce withdrawal Tuesday) we have a massive silver withdrawal to report from Scotia’s vault Wednesday.
SD reader Saddle has noted that the previous 2 silver withdrawals almost exactly equal a coinciding massive new silver deposit just reported into the SLV fund.

As Harvey Organ has long alleged, it would not surprise us if the cartel is currently scrambling to move around what little PHYSICAL silver they have left to meet delivery requests at the SLV.
Saddle notes:
I want to point out something very important. SLV is allowed to increase its inventory through paper contracts, physical, and futures. If you look at the SLV inventory for July 10, 2012 you’ll see it increased from 311,271,605.500 ounces up to 312,823,227.900. This is a net increase of: 1,551,622.4 ounces.
READ MORE

Gold Manipulation Will Be Next Big Scandal to Break

The Telegraph’s Thomas Pascoe, who recently revealed that Britain’s gold was dumped on the market by Gordon Brown in order to rescue Goldman Sachs from a 2 tonne gold short position gone bad, follows Ned Naylor-Leyland’s comments on CNBC this week that gold is manipulated along with LIBOR, stating that gold manipulation may well be the next big scandal to break.

Pascoe rightly asserts that manipulation of gold is a bigger scandal than the manipulation of LIBOR, and states (as we first suggested) that the LIBOR scandal will result in MSM attention of precious metals manipulation for the first time.

In the aftermath of the Libor scandal, the Bank of England complained that it had received no forewarning from the marketplace.
Gold price manipulation may well be the next big scandal to break – if it does, this time nobody can say that they were not warned.

The new media and the 24-hour news cycle have a great deal to answer for, not least encouraging a political class which would otherwise be happily engaged expensing duck houses into the belief that it should demonstrate perpetual action on our behalf – hence the endless stream of badly drafted legislation from the corridors of Whitehall.

It does, however, reveal things that would otherwise be ignored. The issue of manipulation in the gold market which I wrote about last week is a case in point. The ball of half-truths and downright lies which have surrounded the issue for a long time is beginning to unspool in an issue internet activists kept alive long before it was acknowledged by the mainstream media.

People ask why the issue is important at a time of naked market manipulation of the Libor rate. The answer is simple: the Libor manipulation scandal can be seen as the thin end of the wedge in terms of government market manipulation.

Although Libor manipulation affects the interest rates we pay on all number of credit products, gold market manipulation is more serious still.

The price of gold is traditionally a proxy for the value of money. A soaring bullion price is indicative of a lack of faith in fiat currency.

Our financial system is predicated on the notion that money stands as a proxy for the factors of production – capital, labour, land and enterprise.

In short, the abundance of money in the economy should be related to the abundance of those factors. The harder we work, for instance, the more we create. There is more labour in the economy, therefore a rise in the money supply is legitimate in order to mirror this. There is nothing wrong with printing money per se so long as the printing reflects an expansion in the real economy.

Twentieth and Twenty-First century economics appears to have done away with this. Money is now created ex nihilo to feed both the top and bottom ends of society.
Read More
: