On
the heels of of the disclosure that China will buy oil from Iran using
gold, legendary trader and investor, Jim Sinclair, told King World News
that the massive paper gold shorts are now trapped and may see gold gap
up to $3,000 if a vacuum in the physical market develops. Sinclair
described this event as “historic.” But first, here is what Sinclair had to say about the recent trading action in gold:
“You have seen in the last month, a phenomena. If you have eyes in
your head, you have to know when the gold banks enter into the gold
market, offering more for sale than would be mined in the next five
years, they are not in there to sell anything. They are in there to
manipulate the price.”
Jim Sinclair continues:
“Well, we’ve seen some
V-bottoms during daily operations, where they (manipulators) have forced
gold (down) and it just snapped right back. There is no question, it
is a matter of record, that multiple central banks around the world have
been large buyers of a significant amount of gold in the last two
months.
As the paper speculators
attempt to manipulate the price lower, they have run into the physical
buyer who won’t let the physical market follow the paper market. Who is
giving gold a chance here? Who’s talking positively about gold, except
a very few?
(Listening to Martin)
Armstrong and financial TV, you would imagine that gold didn’t have a
chance. Yet every time the manipulators come in to reduce the price
they are running into significant physical buying....
“At the same time, gold will be upgraded by its use in settlement by China and Iran. This is a very significant change.
The physical market is
overcoming the paper market, and gold is being used in huge amounts by a
giant (China) in international commerce, in commercial settlement.
That’s news. This is something that will go down in the history of
gold, that very few have properly analyzed or understood at the present
time.
There is a possibility that
the physical market for gold, on the sell-side, meaning the ability to
buy the physical market to cover against a paper short, might actually
evaporate. The people who are buying gold in the physical market, are
not buying it for selling it tomorrow.
If you have $100 million,
you would want $50 million in gold. If you have $1 trillion, like some
of our over the counter derivative specialists that got their money
through TARP and the other programs, you might not want to keep all of
that $1 trillion in paper. Being the perps of worthless paper, they
should certainly know the foundation of fiat currency, for their
personal wealth, is a very weak foundation sitting in sand.
The type of buyers that
central banks have been, could actually create a situation where the
only supply coming in for gold would be new mining supply. You could
then get into an exogenous event, Israel versus Iran, there are many
possibilities on this planet right now for an event coming out of
nowhere with significant political implications.
You might be trading
somewhere around $1,650. How do you know you couldn’t open at $3,000
the next day if there was no way for this enormous paper short to cover
itself (because) the physical market went into a vacuum? The physical
market is constantly in off-take, it’s not in supply.
You move toward a position
where the risk of being short the metals is so high, that it’s
untenable. You’ve got the possibility of an exogenous event simply by
mistake. Would you want an exogenous event to create a shortage in the
physical market (for gold), against a huge paper short (position), at a
time when currencies, thanks to the use of SWIFT as a weapon, don’t
really look like they have universal acceptability?
That’s right, they don’t
have universal acceptability if you can’t transfer them. This is one
heck of a mess. This is a huge development. It’s something that is
historic in the evolution of gold to the reserve currency of choice.”
1 則留言:
有個問題想問下各位 ching:做 金 / 銀 既 future contract,有冇話規定要幾時埋單架。即係話,JP魔有冇可能無限期咁 roll over 佢地既 future contract 架?
發佈留言