2012年3月4日星期日

TFMR Podcast #14 - Ned Naylor-Leyland Discusses PAGE, Silver and True Price Discovery

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.

To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” 

 
― Richard Buckminster Fuller


Please stop what you're doing and listen to this extremely important interview with Ned Naylor-Leyland of Cheviot Asset Management in London.
Many have wondered what happened to the Pan Asia Gold Exchange. We were all excited last summer when we first heard about it but, then, things went eerily quiet. Today, Ned Naylor-Leyland and Andrew Maguire are finally able to go public with an update on PAGE and, more importantly, information on a brand new exchange that will soon begin trading a spot, physical silver contract.

Please do three things for me:
  1. Listen to this entire podcast.
  2. Read the research note below that Ned published today for Cheviot clients.
  3. Listen to Andy Maguire's interview with Eric King. It can be found here: 
  4. http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/3/2_Whistleblower_Maguire_-_US_Entity_Interferes_in_Gold_Market.html
Today is an historic day in the effort to dislodge the imperial forces that dominate the leveraged, paper markets of gold and silver. We must to grateful to Ned, Andy and all those involved in making this new silver exchange a reality. Ned promises to keep us posted with more details as the launch of the exchange draws near. For now, be comfortable in knowing that we have powerful allies who are intent upon making obsolete the existing model and will soon put forth a new structure, one that finally allows for true price discovery in the precious metals.
TF

P.A.G.E. Squashed: And now for something completely different...
by,
Ned Naylor-Leyland, Cheviot Asset Management
Last year at the GATA Goldrush 2011 conference I presented about the Pan Asia Gold Exchange (PAGE) and the likelihood of the ‘Spot Dog’ shaking off its ‘futures handlers’. This was to happen thanks to this new    game-changing    Chinese Exchange driving a return to a more acceptable form of price discovery. Much water has passed under the bridge since the ‘soft’ opening of PAGE in the early summer of last year, and everyone is well overdue an update. Meanwhile,thanks in no small measure to the debacle at MFGlobal, the spot dog has indeed thrown off its handlers (hence the emergence of backwardation in Silver) – but, as can be inferred from the title above, PAGE has also been squashed, Monty Python-style.
Fortunately, however, this is far from the full story, as the players behind the 1:1 allocated market concept are determined to make it run come hell and/or high water. The market is begging for this return to real price discovery and in spite of the interference so far, the change IS coming. It is disappointing to have to report that PAGE has not rolled out the way we anticipated, however everything that I presented at the GATA Goldrush conference was accurate at the time. The fact that a major Chinese regional development program was stalled appears, at least in part, to have been due to the publicity generated by Andrew Maguire and I. Too much is very evidently at stake in the world of Ponzi Bullion banking for the status quo not to fight its corner. Soon after the noise was made about PAGE and its forthcoming 1:1 allocated Gold contract, the shenanigans started. Just after the publicized ‘soft launch’ (with Central government mandarins in attendance) and the noise made on the internet about its implications, the one shareholder in PAGE that had a foreign listing (in the US) suddenly and stealthily increased its share-holding from 10% to 25%, acquiring additional board directors along the way. The rationale for this sudden change in the weighting of shareholders is shrouded in mystery, however what we do know is that this entity then insisted that they be allowed to build the trading platforms for PAGE from the ground up, rather than buying a working platform off the shelf to get PAGE operational in a timely manner.
This blocking tactic at board level effectively stopped the progress of the fully-allocated spot contract in its tracks, and it was immediately clear to the international-facing people that something fundamental had changed internally.    Interestingly, the key Independent Director of this small listed entity that blocked the timely roll-out of PAGE is a well-known Western banker within China, whose CV includes work for the Federal Trade Commission, the Sloan Foundation (related to MIT) and his wife is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Whether this intervention respect of the platform was nefarious or not, it was understandable that the people behind the international-facing fully-allocated contract decided to step aside from PAGE and set up their own dedicated exchange. More on that in a moment. Following on from this removal of the 1:1 international contract, the domestic and leveraged PAGE Gold contract (via the Agricultural Bank) also subsequently went the way of the dodo, thanks to the well- publicized People’s Bank of China (PBoC) announcement about control over domestic Gold trading outside of Shanghai. It appears that the shiny Gold building constructed in Kunming City for PAGE will sadly remain (as elsewhere in China) a ‘see- through’, at least until the new Communist Party Politburo are voted in and the new political culture is embedded later this year when who knows, the rules on Gold trading again may be relaxed. Ostensibly these new PBoC rules about Gold trading were brought in to ‘protect the public’, but it is interesting to me that such a U-turn in policy appears to have been driven by pressure exerted somewhere within the People’s Bank, rather than it being typically characteristic of the long-term planning of the Chinese.
As disappointing as this all appears, there is a very substantial Silver lining to what has happened, both respect of the international allocated contracts and the indeed the domestic leveraged ones. By freeing themselves of the other shareholders within PAGE, the international-facing contracts are now being developed independently and under a new name. After the shenanigans of last year Andrew and I will not be giving the name of this new exchange until it is properly ‘live’ in a few months time, as it seems obvious that too much is at stake within the existing Bullion Banking system for this to be allowed to launch without some attempt at interference.
The aforementioned change in domestic Chinese rules mean that along with every other regional Precious Metals exchange, the new unnamed 1:1 allocated exchange is launching with Silver initially, which of course is the Achilles Heel of the Bullion banking system. This in my opinion is far more bullish and exciting short and medium-term than the Gold contract would have been, as the physical Silver market is so tight.    Furthermore, all the regional exchanges mothballed by the PBoC rule change can switch, and are switching to Silver trading which is not covered by the change in rules. The contract itself will be, as before, an international rolling 90 day spot one, denominated in RMB, and the new entity is supported by the same serious players within the Chinese political and military establishment as before. The physical will be acquired ahead of closing each monthly tranche and will be vaulted entirely outside of the Bullion Banks (i.e. private vaulting facilities). From there the allocated receipts will be recorded on an electronic register and the issue will be tradeable in the secondary market with the register adjusted real-time. This is extremely good news for holders of real Silver and extremely bad news for holders of fake paper Silver who rely on the 350:1 leverage being maintained as the world’s sole price discovery mechanism for large purchases of the white metal. This effectively will be like dealing in an RMB-denominated and fully allocated version of some of the popular Silver Bullion Trusts, but rather than trading at a premium, the premium will price the issue ahead of purchase, affecting global price discovery, as previously mooted.
The guts of this new exchange that is rising Phoenix-like from the ashes of PAGE, are agreed and under construction. The international conduit for the new exchange has also been established and is ready to receive business once the legal framework (well down the road) is given final sign off by their Chinese legal team. Unlike PAGE, which was primarily established by domestic Chinese interests, the new entity is much more streamlined, better funded and the problems encountered last year by PAGE have helped to clarify the route going forwards.  All in all, the squashing of the Pan Asia Gold Exchange has in truth only served to accelerate the move to real price discovery, and the control over domestic Gold trading is in my opinion yet another reason to be bullish about the prospects for the Silver price. Once the new exchange is ‘live’ in the summer we will be back with the all- important details about where and how to gain access for those interested in buying physical in size rather than paper illusions. Many serious physical Silver buyers, who are desperate to leave the farce of the Loco London system are ready to jump ship once the final sign off takes place.

Ned Naylor-Leyland
February 2012



Original Source

Vietnam battles 'gold fever' as price soars





歷來越南人都有收藏黃金的習慣﹐但最近金價的升勢﹐促使政府想辦法來控制局面。


根據世界黃金協會的統計﹐過去一年間﹐越南人民購買黃金的數量﹐以人均計算﹐已超越了印度和中國。而當地金價升幅達18%﹐遠超出國際市場的11%。


即使當地金價比國際價高出US$100﹐越南人仍然踴躍購買。一位被訪的60歲退休人士表示﹕“我仍然以黃金作為積蓄﹐因為黃金到處都有價值﹐變賣又很方便﹐我需要錢的話﹐隨時可以拿一些去賣。


雖然這是越南人世世代代的習俗﹐政府則很憂慮﹐因為通脹已達到18%﹐而本地貨幣的價值受動搖。


二十年前才開放黃金市場﹐如今政府又要想辦法再次控制黃金自由買賣。去年夏天開始﹐政府已推出一連串措施﹐包括把胡志明市最大的金商納入中央銀行管轄。政府的解釋就是﹐由中央銀行來取代之前的眾多民間黃金經銷商﹐會令市場更平穩﹐減少價格波動﹐亦可防止更多人把資金投向黃金﹐直接危及貨幣。


另一個考慮中的措施就是禁止現時十萬間金鋪出售純金條﹐限制它們只可以售賣黃金首飾。


一位金鋪經理受訪時說﹐“政府要控制金價﹐我不能說這是否是件好事。當然﹐國內的經濟需要有個平穩的環境。他卻不願意透露他的姓名。


但是﹐越南人則仍然情願把積蓄變為黃金﹐即使銀行存款利息達11%﹐因為物價升幅更高達18.6%。


一名前國家高級經濟分析司說﹐“最近股票和地產市場都大瀉﹐中央銀行又有消息透露貨幣即會有貶值的空間。在這個情況下﹐人民難免為了保值而設法買黃金。”


另外﹐一位社會學家又說﹐“買黃金是越南數百年來的傳統習慣。越南過去有很多戰亂和動蕩的日子。朝代可以逝去﹐貨幣可以改換﹐但黃金則是永恆的。”


政府嘗試控制黃金的措施﹐正是配合著另一個行動﹐這就是鼓勵人民把收藏起的黃金放入銀行。任何願意把家中的黃金交托於銀行的人﹐政府正考慮給予他們一些誘因﹐例如讓他們得到存金的利息。


根據政府估計﹐在金融體制之外﹐民間擁有的黃金達300至500噸之多。


一位銀行官員表示﹐“如果利息夠給引﹐而銀行的信譽又有改善的話﹐相信有達80%的人會願意把黃金交給銀行的。”


今天的黃金熱潮是過去二十年﹐由於越南放棄社會主義制度﹐經濟增長的結晶。但是﹐今天的經濟增長﹐被頑強的高通脹和貪污拖累。


經濟學家補充說﹐“如果人民對制度恢復信心﹐黃金熱潮就會得以降溫。政府要急需取代人民對黃金的依賴。但是﹐政府的措施要符合人民的利益﹐否則這些措施只會逼使民間的黃金買賣走到黑市的市場去。那個時候﹐政府就更難管制了。”他估計現時每年已有20至60噸黃金是由非法渠道進口的。


街上的小市民則對政府的措施不看好。正如一位40歲的黃金交易商所說﹐“措施會對黃金買賣加添一些障礙。但是﹐人們總會找到買賣金條的途徑吧。”

Original Source

2012年3月3日星期六

Silver retreats from Resistance but holding Support


Silver bulls could not take the metal through the resistance zone near $35.50 so the market has now retreated lower as longs take profits and some new shorts sell against that level. Support remains down near the $34 level and the spike low from Wednesday's wild takedown.
 


Orginial Source

John Embry : Gold & Silver on the cusp of breaking out

John Embry -- Chief Investment Strategist at the Canadian firm Sprott Asset Management -- discusses the recent correction in the gold and silver prices , John argues that long-term savers and investors in precious metals should not panic in the face of such corrections because gold and silver are on the verge of a break out especially when we take into consideration the rising gas prices and its impact on the cost of mining gold and silver

你使用的是什麼貨幣?

自古以來,君王使用的貨幣是黃金、貴族使用的貨幣是白銀、老百姓使用的貨幣是以物易物,而奴隸所使用的貨幣則是債務。
而從1971年起,君王給了貴族許多特權和好處後,債務就成了老百姓和奴隸所使用的唯一貨幣了。
基本上,奴隸制度並沒有在這個世界消失,只是君王和貴族把更多的人搞成奴隸階級,再讓奴隸穿得好一點、吃得好一點,奴隸一多就可以互相取暖,就有一種「大 家都一樣」的安全感,再給奴隸從小到大的教育中加上洗腦,然後給他們一個好聽的新名稱:「中產階級、上班族」,並為他們安排好一些諸如加薪、升遷、買房 子......等象徵成功中產階級的人生大夢,從此奴隸就乖乖聽話、不會逃跑、不敢跨出牢籠,並且子子孫孫都甘願成為奴隸了。


羅勃特清崎在其第一本著作《富爸爸窮爸爸》就寫道:「富人有他的那套規則,而富人的規則對大多數窮人和中產階級來說還是個秘密。其他那些占人口百分之九十五的窮人和中產階級則有他們的規則,而他們是從學校學到這些規則的」。
也就是說,快車道和老鼠賽跑,不僅僅是遊戲規則不同,就連思維也不同、價值觀也不同、作為也不同。當然,命運和結果也不同。
最後,問題來了:
在富爸爸的現金流象限中,E象限叫做雇員、B象限叫做企業主,但是500年前,E象限的人叫做?B象限的人叫做?
但是我們也不用氣餒,我們正處在一個可以靠自己的努力就能改變所處象限的新世界,而這個關鍵就是?




和債務貨幣作搏鬥已經是我們絕大多數人一生不可避免的課題,而且在我們有生之年很有可能都要活在這樣的遊戲規則中。但是人生本來就不公平也不簡單,我們唯一能做的,就是看清楚遊戲規則,並且找出自己相對有利的立足點,發揮自己的天賦,打造屬於自己的幸福國度。
最能夠保值的錢並不是黃金;最有增值潛力的錢也不是白銀,而是如富爸爸紀念銀幣上所印的:「KNOWLEDGE:THE NEW MONEY」。因為,每個人其實都可以自己印鈔票。



Original Source

柏南克沒說QE3又如何? 自有別的什麼帶動黃金市場

聯準會主席柏南克 (Ben Bernanke) 周三於國會發表半年度報告,他的言論被投資人解讀為「不會有QE3了」,於是黃金大跌 4%,白銀與其他貴金屬也大跌。

《CNNMoney》專欄作者Paul R. La Monica 撰文表示,投資人會認為量化寬鬆是商品價格上漲的代名詞,因為聯準會會購買長期債券,好壓低利率水平。

QE、QE2、以短債換長債的扭曲操作 (Operation Twist)本質上都和印鈔票沒兩樣。鈔票印的越多,美元的價值就越低,這除了導致石油等以美元計價的資產價格上揚,還會人們籠罩在通膨的陰霾之下,這對黃金投資人來說再美妙不過了。

如果柏南克的言論中連 QE3 的暗示都找不到,對黃金走勢來說會是利空嗎?其實黃金熱就像是流感病毒,24 小時都不斷突變。

一到周四,黃金跟其他商品又通通反彈了,一些投資專家認為周三的賣壓可能是短期的震盪。

Auerbach Grayson全球技術策略師Richard Ross說,貴金屬市場周三因為風險背離出現凶猛的回檔,但黃金市場依舊強健。

Ross 指出,如果投資人真的對柏南克發言感到緊張,黃金應該會在周四繼續下跌,畢竟他的言論中完全找不到QE3 的線索。

事實上金價從今年初開始起算,到周三柏南克發表報告前,總共上漲了超過 10%,出現回檔並不是太大的意外。

Ross 表示,周四的反彈顯示投資人把黃金跌深當成了重新進場的理由,此舉看似對投資人心理上沒有任何危害。

研究機構 TrimTabs 的總經研究總監 Madeline Schnapp 也同意這樣的觀點,他認為周三是貴金屬市場反應過度了。

Schnapp 表示,就算柏南克沒有暗示 QE3,但扭曲操作也會在 6 月宣告結束,市場依舊期待聯準會今年稍後會提出一些刺激方案。

而且柏南克也沒有說經濟已經處於良好狀態,這也是為什麼聯準會承諾到 2014 年底前,都會讓短期利率維持接近 零的低水準。種種跡象顯示聯準會仍會維持鬆綁模式好一陣子,這對黃金市場來說很棒。

財務管理公司SICA 總裁及投資長Jeff Sica 說,就算柏南克沒有釋出QE3 的信號,也不代表最終不會有其他寬鬆措施。

柏南克也不希望商品價格高漲,所以如果不是局勢再度惡化,他不會輕易提到QE3。

Sica 深信柏南克在今年稍後就會扣下 QE3 的扳機,尤其才稍有回溫的就業市場近來又有再度冷卻的跡象。

因此 Sica 也在周三大跌時搶進更多貴金屬,他透過ETF 買進黃金、白銀、鈀與白金。

他買進的 ETF 包括,ETFS實體瑞士黃金ETF (ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares-SGOL)、ETFS實體白銀ETF (ETFS Physical Silver Shares -SIVR)、ETFS實體鈀價ETF (ETFS Physical Palladium Shares-PALL) 以及 ETFS實體白金ETF (ETFS Physical Platinum Shares-PPLT)。

Sica 強調就算量化寬鬆會進一步推升商品價格,只要美國經濟復甦受到當前高油價的侵害,柏南克還是會祭出QE3 的。

美聯儲拖累了美國經濟

研究發現,在美聯儲創立之前,美國經濟的表現更好,破壞經濟穩定的首要嫌疑人就是美聯儲



美聯儲拖累了美國經濟?

GENE EPSTEIN

明年年底﹐美國的貨幣官僚機構就要迎來百歲誕辰了﹐不過﹐恐怕並非所有人都認為這件事值得慶祝。正如各位所知﹐我說的正是美國聯邦儲備體系(Federal Reserve System)﹐這個體系根據美國國會的一項法案創立﹐並於1913年12月23日由威爾遜 (Woodrow Wilson)總統簽署為法律。

或許﹐對於改革美國聯邦儲備委員會的某些做法一事﹐大多數經濟學家都持開放的態度。事實上﹐一位重要的改革者就是現任美聯儲最高官員──美聯儲主席貝南克(Ben S. Bernanke)。但主流觀點仍毫不懷疑美聯儲對美國經濟的積極影響﹐這種絕對信念在一定程度上可能是由利己主義激發的。美聯儲並非唯一一家為這些沉悶乏味的科學家提供資金、權力和名望的機構﹐不過它在這方面無疑做得相當不錯。

只有少數異端敢於質疑美聯儲在美國經濟方面發揮的作用。佐治亞大學(University of Georgia)經濟學教授塞爾林(George Selgin)就是其中之一﹐他的控訴方式直截了當﹐令人耳目一新。

若以某種非主流的貨幣和信貸動態理論為依據﹐有人會認為建立央行制度並不明智﹐並據此立論。不過塞爾林沒有採用這種深奧的論據﹐而是採用了簡單的對照法。他提出的問題是:以美聯儲自己制定的目標來衡量﹐美聯儲創立之後﹐美國經濟的表現是否比創立之前更好?

塞爾林將美聯儲“創立後”的期限從第二次世界大戰結束後算起﹐從而免除了美聯儲在上世紀30年代大蕭條中的責任﹐如此一來經濟狀況的記錄就朝著有利於美聯儲的方向發生了偏離。而“創立前”的期限則從19世紀70年代開始。他在一次滔滔不絕且條理清晰的談話中聲稱:美聯儲創立前的制度糟透了。但那時的制度是否就比美聯儲所制定的制度更差呢?

塞爾林詳盡調查了多方面數據﹐包括失業率、物價水平、經濟波動幅度以及衰退發生頻率。在最後一個標準上﹐他的發現或許會讓熟悉標準數據的人意外。修正衰退標準數據的不是別人﹐正是美國總統奧巴馬(Obama)的前白宮經濟顧問委員會主席羅默(Christina Romer)﹐她認為1913年以前發生的經濟衰退遠遠不像人們之前以為的那麼嚴重。

塞爾林最終得出的結論是:基本上在你可以想到的各個方面﹐1913年前的美國經濟至少可與二戰後相媲美﹐而且通常情況下還要更好。

如今﹐相信美聯儲“神授統治”的人越發少了﹐而美聯儲的責任是要證明﹐美國經濟在它的“統治”下比沒有它的時候要更好。

此外﹐還有一個充分理由可讓你相信美聯儲的存在弊大於利。相比1913年前﹐二戰後美國政府在國民經濟中的作用大大加強﹐採取反經濟週期的舉措以穩定經濟的情況也較多。就憑這一點﹐主流經濟學本身就堅持認為﹐美國經濟本應當在近現代史上有更為出色的表現。而事實上它表現更糟﹐原因可能是什麼呢?破壞經濟穩定的首要嫌疑人就是美聯儲。

塞爾林就這一話題與其他兩位經濟學家撰寫了一篇論文﹐不久後大家就能在美國《宏觀經濟學雜志》(Journal of Macroeconomics)上看到。屆時﹐我們不禁要問一個“大逆不道”的問題:美聯儲的百歲壽誕是否應成為它過的最後一個生日?